Cape Town Pride to change controversial 2016 theme
Cape Town Pride has once again become embroiled in controversy after some members of the community questioned its chosen theme for next year.
The theme for the 2016 edition in February was recently announced as being “Gay, Proud and Colourblind.”
It was, however, attacked by critics who argued that “gay” was exclusionary of other members of the LGBTI+ community.
The term “colourblind” was also slammed as being offensive, not reflecting the reality of South Africa’s racial inequality and pandering to “white-privileged” gay men.
Pride organisers claimed on their Facebook page that the theme’s critics had “threatened to derail Pride 2016.”
Mambaonline received an e-mail from the Cape Town-based OUT magazine warning that, “Pride as we know it is in the process of being hijacked by a group of radical homophobes.”
It said that this group had “already met to discuss the disruption of 2016 Cape Town Pride and are asking that the City ban the permits for Pride.”
“They are opposed to celebration of Gay achievements through Pride and instead want a political event. Let us show Cape Town that we are proud to be ‘gay’ regardless of colour or gender and we need not be ashamed to have a party and celebrate what we have achieved,” wrote the magazine’s Tommy Patterson.
Reacting to the furore on Pride’s Facebook page, Joanne Fairbrother commented, that, “If Pride is genuinely invested in ‘Uniting the Cultures of Cape Town?’ then I think it’s a good idea to start listening to some other voices.”
Scott Fuller added: “I think the issue here is ‘colourblind’. We live in South Africa. Race matters. It will always matter, forever and always. To say you’re colourblind is to be wilfully ignorant to the many discriminations and inequalities that POC (people of colour) in the queer+ community still face. And yes, homophobia affects all, but if you’re a rich white gay living in Clifton, I can promise you that you’re sheltered from a hell of a lot more than POC in the gay community.”
In response to the debate, Cape Town Pride posted a Facebook poll asking the community for its support or disapproval of the theme.
This in itself was attacked as being unrepresentative, lacking context and not being capable of reflecting the wider LGBTI+ community’s views. Nevertheless, at the time of writing this story, 70 people had voted against the theme, 40 were in favour and 11 said they didn’t care.
On Thursday morning, Cape Town Pride Director Matthew Van As confirmed that the theme would be abandoned and admitted that its choice could have been better handled.
“Due to the tremendous response and interest from the community about the theme of Cape Town Pride 2016 we have heard and acknowledge that there was a short-sightedness from our side and as such we are changing the theme for 2016,” he wrote.
He urged members of the community to submit their ideas for a new theme by e-mailing theme@capetownpride.org. Van As explained that organisers will put up a short-list of themes, within the next week, for everyone to vote on.
Cape Town Pride has repeatedly come under fire for not consulting sufficiently with the LGBTI+ community, for hosting expensive and exclusionary “white” events, and not being representative of the larger community.
The event has faced boycotts from some LGBTI+ groups and last year activists hosted a series of “alternative inclusive” Pride events.
Cape Town Pride organisers, who are volunteers, argue that that any member of the community is welcome to join their ranks and to submit and organise events that would fall under the Pride banner.
“It was, however, attacked by critics who argued that “gay” was exclusionary of other members of the LGBTI+ community.”
Why use the word ATTACK? It was challenged – why must you guys always make differing voices sound violent and unruly? What is wrong with you white people? No man.
Also the tone of this article, although a display of both sides – still slant towards one side. Why is it so difficult to get an unbiased and neutral tone going here?
Cape Town Pride is currently insensitive and racist. The mere fact that they failed to issue an apology to the Cape Town community highlights this clearly. People were offended – for goodness sake, say Sorry!
And this sensational comment “Mambaonline received an e-mail from the Cape Town-based OUT magazine warning that, “Pride as we know it is in the process of being hijacked by a group of radical homophobes”? really? This is at the very least, another of those utter untruths not to mention another load of rubbish. Who would these “homophobes be? Oh yes, they are the ones who are part of the “Gay achievements ” a little correction though ~ these achievements ….like the inclusion of equality for LGBTI persons in the Constitution, same sex marriage, the adoption of children by same sex couple, a National Task Team on Hate Crimes, input on 10 policy documents during the past 5 months that directly impact the lives of LGBTIQ persons and monitoring hate crimes cases are in no way “achievements through Pride “. Pride in no way seeks to highlight challenges that still exist or the inequality that is still rife even within the LGBTIQ “community” (used loosely). No we are out there “being proud”. Proud of what I ask? Yes, there is absolutely nothing wrong with a party and celebrating who we are but for the love of everything beautiful – if you are going to write up stuff like this, you do need to do a little background research that reflects the actual problem here and not just put it down to an angry group of people who persist on being problematic. The world was never changed by what currently happens through the streets of Cape Town annually